> When you say "on /About/, any generated links get mapped to
> /Policy/ and NOT /About/Policy" can you provide an example of what
> source generates the link? -- [[Jon]]
+
+>> No, a \[[map]] call, such as:
+>>
+>> (actual code)<br />
+>> = = = = =<br />
+>> \[[!map pages="About/*" show="title"]]<br />
+>> = = = = =<br />
+>>
+>> The end result is:<br />
+>> (actual code)
+>>
+<pre>
+<div class="map">
+<ul>
+<li><a class="mapitem" href="./Policy/">Policy</a>
+<ul>
+<li><a class="mapitem" href="./Policy/Microblog/">Microblogging subscription policy</a>
+</li>
+</ul>
+</li>
+</ul>
+</div>
+</pre>
+
+> I'm also confused about what is generating the links. The map directive?
+> You? --[[Joey]]
+
+>> see above :)
+
+>> I suspect this is due to git scanning everything under the pwd of the .git/ directory, but not totally so.
+
+>>> Ikiwiki never, ever, looks in directories with names starting with a
+>>> dot. --[[Joey]]
+
+>> Other ikiwiki sites I have don't do this, and work OK, on the same server, but different docroots.
+
+>>> Well, I've moved my blog to under my site's docroot - in terms of git
+>>> and ikiwiki - and it's still cutting out a whole directory level. I
+>>> have no idea what's going on. I need to check the code. The site is at
+>>> http://simonraven.kisikew.org/ - if you follow the "About" link, you'll
+>>> understand exactly what's going on, if you look at the URL in your
+>>> status bar (or under your cursor if you're using a text browser).
+
+>>>> Your page contains the following in its html:
+>>>> `<base href="../" />`
+>>>>
+>>>> Given a link like "./Policy/", which is *correct*, and when on the
+>>>> About page will normally link to the About/Policy page, this causes
+>>>> the link to really link to ".././Policy/" which is of course broken.
+>>>>
+>>>> Ikiwiki's standard page templates do not contain this base tag, so
+>>>> I guess your customised templates are broken. --[[Joey]] [[done]]
+
+>>>>> I totally forgot about that tag... good catch. I was thinking it was my template that was broken, since yesterday, but I couldn't see what. Thank you very much for your eyes.
+