> I think it would make sense to have "pagespec" in the name somehow.
-> > Good idea, how about `pagespecalias`? — [[Jon]]
+>> Good idea, how about `pagespecalias`? — [[Jon]]
->
> No, the strict/warnings does not make me puke. Have you read my perl
> code? :-P
>
>> Useful indeed! --[[Joey]]
->>> I've tweaked my patch in light of your above feedback: The plugin has
->>> been renamed, and I now validate keys. I've also added documentation to
->>> the branch. I haven't read rubykat's code properly yet, and don't have
->>> access at the time of writing (I'm on a beach in Greece ☺), but I expect
->>> it would be possible to extend what I've got here to support defining the
+>>> I've tweaked my patch in light of your above feedback: The plugin has been
+>>> renamed, and I now validate keys. I've also added documentation and tests
+>>> to the branch. I haven't read rubykat's code properly yet, and don't have
+>>> access at the time of writing (I'm on a beach in Greece ☺), but I expect it
+>>> would be possible to extend what I've got here to support defining the
>>> aliases in a PageSpec, once the dependency stuff has been reasoned out
>>> properly.
>>>