web commit by joey

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / about_rcs_backends.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn b/doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn
index 4aba78fc043232a0d539e657b693cbd812f9ab2a..1aafd4a8ee50ad412b9f0546c247c359f5c6a012 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn
+++ b/doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
-## A few bits about the RCS backends
+# A few bits about the RCS backends
 
-### Terminology
+## Terminology
 
 ``web-edit'' means that a page is edited by using the web (CGI) interface
 as opposed to using a editor and the RCS interface.
 
 
-### [[Subversion]]
+## [[Subversion]]
 
 Subversion was the first RCS to be supported by ikiwiki.
 
-#### How does it work internally?
+### How does it work internally?
 
 Master repository M.
 
@@ -22,15 +22,18 @@ HTML is generated from W.  rcs_update() will update from M to W.
 
 CGI operates on W.  rcs_commit() will commit from W to M.
 
+For all the gory details of how ikiwiki handles this behind the scenes,
+see [[commit-internals]].
+
 You browse and web-edit the wiki on W.
 
 
-### [darcs](http://darcs.net/) (not yet included)
+## [darcs](http://darcs.net/) (not yet included)
 
 Support for using darcs as a backend is being worked on by [Thomas
 Schwinge](mailto:tschwinge@gnu.org).
 
-#### How will it work internally?
+### How will it work internally?
 
 ``Master'' repository R1.
 
@@ -45,29 +48,45 @@ There is a working copy of R1: R2.
 CGI operates on R2.  rcs_commit() will push from R2 to R1.
 
 You browse the wiki on R1 and web-edit it on R2.  This means for example
-that R2 needs to be updated from R1 if you are going the web-edit a page,
+that R2 needs to be updated from R1 if you are going to web-edit a page,
 as the user otherwise might be irritated otherwise...
 
 How do changes get from R1 to R2?  Currently only internally in
-rcs_commit().  Is rcs_prepedit() suitable?
+rcs\_commit().  Is rcs\_prepedit() suitable?
 
 It follows that the HTML rendering and the CGI handling can be completely
 separated parts in ikiwiki.
 
 What repository should [[RecentChanges]] and [[History]] work on?  R1?
 
-##### Rationale for doing it differently than in the Subversion case
+#### Rationale for doing it differently than in the Subversion case
 
 darcs is a distributed RCS, which means that every checkout of a
 repository is equal to the repository it was checked-out from.  There is
 no forced hierarchy.
 
-R1 is the nevertheless called the master repository.  It's used for
+R1 is nevertheless called the master repository.  It's used for
 collecting all the changes and publishing them: on the one hand via the
 rendered HTML and on the other via the standard darcs RCS interface.
 
-R2, the repository where CGI operates on, is just a checkout of R1 and
+R2, the repository the CGI operates on, is just a checkout of R1 and
 doesn't really differ from the other checkouts that people will branch
 off from R1.
 
 (To be continued.)
+
+
+## [[Git]]
+
+Regarding the Git support, Recai says:
+
+I have been testing it for the past few days and it seems satisfactory.  I
+haven't observed any race condition regarding the concurrent blog commits
+and it handles merge conflicts gracefully as far as I can see.
+
+As you may notice from the patch size, GIT support is not so trivial to
+implement (for me, at least).  Being a fairly fresh code base it has some
+bugs.  It also has some drawbacks (especially wrt merge which was the hard
+part).  GIT doesn't have a similar functionality like 'svn merge -rOLD:NEW
+FILE' (please see the relevant comment in mergepast for more details), so I
+had to invent an ugly hack just for the purpose.