used. Although, having every page declare an explicit dep on `page.tmpl`
is perhaps a bit much; might be better to implement a special case for that
one. Also, having the templates be copied to `destdir` is not desirable.
-(However, if they're not copied, wikilinks to them will be broken. Hmm.)
+In a sense, these template would be like internal pages, except not wiki
+pages, but raw files.
The risk is that a site might have `allowed_attachments` set to
`templates/*` or `*.tmpl` something like that. I think such a configuration
(This would also help to clear up the tricky disctinction between
wikitemplates and in-wiki templates.)
+Note also that when using templates from "$srcdir/templates/", `no_includes`
+needs to be set. Currently this is done by the two plugins that use
+such templates, while includes are allowed in `templatedir`.
+
> But would this require that templates be parseable as wiki pages? Because that would be a nuisance. --[[KathrynAndersen]]
>> It would be better for them not to be rendered separately at all.
>>>> need to be treated as wiki pages. (They need to be treated
>>>> as raw files anyway, because you don't want random users editing them
>>>> in the online editor.) --[[Joey]]
+
+>>>>> Just to be clear, the raw files would not be copied across to the output
+>>>>> directory? -- [[Jon]]
+
+>>>>>> Without modifying ikiwiki, they'd be copied to the output directory as
+>>>>>> (e.g.) http://ikiwiki.info/templates/inlinepage.tmpl; to not copy them,
+>>>>>> it'd either be necessary to make them be internal pages
+>>>>>> (templates/inlinepage._tmpl) or special-case them in some other way.
+>>>>>> --[[smcv]]