> I agree that a plugin would probably be more cumbersome, but it is very
> doable. It might look something like this:
> I agree that a plugin would probably be more cumbersome, but it is very
> doable. It might look something like this:
>> This is, however, still missing specifying the link text, and adding that option would seem to me to complicate the plugin syntax a lot, unless support is added for the |-syntax for specifying a particular parameter to every plugin.
>> This is, however, still missing specifying the link text, and adding that option would seem to me to complicate the plugin syntax a lot, unless support is added for the |-syntax for specifying a particular parameter to every plugin.
>> ... Returning to this, the syntax infact wouldn't be so bad with the |-syntax, given a short name for the plugin:
[[whatever|ref 1]]
>> ... Returning to this, the syntax infact wouldn't be so bad with the |-syntax, given a short name for the plugin:
[[whatever|ref 1]]
>>>> But this doesn't work so well for links that aren't valid keys. Such
>>>> as stuff with spaces in it. I'd like to be able to write any kind of
>>>> But this doesn't work so well for links that aren't valid keys. Such
>>>> as stuff with spaces in it. I'd like to be able to write any kind of
>> It also shouldn't be difficult to support non-wiki links in this same
>> way, so that you could still link everywhere in an uniform manner, as
>> It also shouldn't be difficult to support non-wiki links in this same
>> way, so that you could still link everywhere in an uniform manner, as