> I think the historical assumption was that even if the date can't be parsed for the
> second purpose, you still want the first purpose. However, you're right that this is
> really fragile, and the first purpose seems fairly niche anyway.
-> In ikiwiki git master (to be released as 3.20180321 or later) I've made `\[[!meta]]`
+> In ikiwiki git master (to be released as 3.20180321 or later) I've made `\[[!meta date=...]]`
+> and `\[[!meta updated=...]]`
> produce an error message if you don't have `Date::Parse` or if the date/time is
> malformed.
>
> without parsing the date, they can still use `\[[!meta name="date" content="xxx"]]`.
>
> [[!tag done]] --[[smcv]]
+
+> > To my defense, when I wrote this, I didn't consider this a bug: I
+> > was assuming the problem I was seeing was just some dumb mistake
+> > that I made and, indeed, there *was* one such formatting mistake.
+> >
+> > But yeah, I could have re-edited this whole thing to make it look
+> > better. I'm sorry, but I was at the end of an already long
+> > yak-shaving session...
+> >
+> > I wasn't sure if doing an error was the right way to go, as this
+> > might break rendering for existing sites... But I'm glad you fixed
+> > this anyways!
+> >
+> > Thank you for the super-fast-response! :) I also tried updating
+> > the [[meta directive documentation|ikiwiki/directive/meta]] so
+> > that it's a little more detailed about that stuff. I hope that's
+> > alright... -- [[anarcat]]