> The basic transformation would be to call `titlepage($page)` (in the
> C locale), followed by replacing "/" with "+" (since "/" is not
> valid in mails). --[[Joey]]
+ >> I guess you are right, there is no point being more obscure
+ >> than necessary. I am leaning towards [something](http://www.cs.unb.ca/~bremner/blog/posts/encoding) not
+ >> calling titlepage but in the same spirit. --[[DavidBremner]]
+
* on the mail receiving end, these messages are either deleted, or ran through
a filter to be turned into blog posts.
* the same plugin can check for comments on a particular page next time the wiki
is generated, and add a link. (more or less done)
> If the filter just checks in the posts into revision control, the
- > post-commit hook would haldle updating the wiki to include those
+ > post-commit hook would handle updating the wiki to include those
> posts as they come in. --[[Joey]]
* work in progress can be
Any comments? Write them here or send them to [[DavidBremner]]
+> I don't want to derail this with too much blue-skying, but I was thinking
+> earlier that it would be nice if ikiwiki could do something sensible with
+> mailbox files, such as turning them into a (threaded?) blog display.
+>
+> One reason I was thinking about that was just that it would be nice to
+> be able to use ikiwiki for mailing list archives. But another reason was
+> that it would be nice to solve the problem described in
+> [[discussion_page_as_blog]]. For that you really want a threaded system,
+> and mailbox file formats already have threading.
+>
+> If that were done, it would tie into what you're working on in an
+> interesting way, since the incoming mail would only need to be committed to
+> the appropriate mailbox file, with ikiwiki then running to process it.
+> --[[Joey]]
+>> It is an interesting idea. I like that it uses an arbitrary MUA
+>> as a "moderation" interface. One thing it made me think about is
+>> how to encode reference (threading) information. One can of
+>> course encode this into local-part, but I wonder if it would be
+>> better to use header features of mailto (this could also be an
+>> alternative to tagged mail addresses for page references).
+>> Various client handling of mailto always seemed a bit fragile to
+>> me but maybe I am just behind the times. Most headers are ignored, but
+>> pseudo-headers in the body might work. For example:
+>>[test](mailto:bremner@somewhere.ca?body=X-Iki-Page:%20test%0AX-Iki-thread:%20foobar). I hesitate to use the subject because every mail admin in the
+>> world seems to want to add things to the front of it.
+>> -- [[DavidBremner]]