arrange for coordinated disclosure when a fix is available. The maintainers
are [[Joey Hess|joey]] (<joey@kitenet.net>),
[[Simon McVittie|smcv]] (<smcv@debian.org>)
-and [[Amitai Schleier|schmonz]] (`schmonz-web-ikiwiki schmonz com`).
+and [[Amitai Schleier|schmonz]] (<schmonz-web-ikiwiki@schmonz.com>).
[[!toc levels=2]]
for sites where an untrusted user is able to attach files with arbitrary
names and/or run a setuid ikiwiki wrapper with a working directory of
their choice.
+
+## Editing restriction bypass for git revert
+
+intrigeri discovered that a web or git user could revert a change to a
+page they are not allowed to edit, if the change being reverted was made
+before the page was moved from a location where that user had permission
+to edit it. For example, if a file is moved from `drafts/policy.mdwn`
+(editable by less-trusted users) to `policy.mdwn` (only editable
+by more-trusted users), a less-trusted user could revert a change
+that was made to `drafts/policy.mdwn` prior to that move, and it would
+result in `policy.mdwn` being altered.
+
+This affects sites with the `git` VCS and the `recentchanges` plugin,
+which are both used in most ikiwiki installations.
+
+This bug was reported on 2016-12-17. A partially fixed version
+3.20161219 was released on 2016-12-19, but the solution used in that
+version was not effective with git versions older than 2.8.0.
+
+([[!cve CVE-2016-10026]] represents the original vulnerability.
+OVE-20161226-0002 represents the incomplete fix in 3.20161219.)
+
+## Commit metadata forgery via CGI::FormBuilder context-dependent APIs
+
+When CGI::FormBuilder->field("foo") is called in list context (and
+in particular in the arguments to a subroutine that takes named
+arguments), it can return zero or more values for foo from the CGI
+request, rather than the expected single value. This breaks the usual
+Perl parsing convention for named arguments, similar to CVE-2014-1572
+in Bugzilla (which was caused by a similar API design issue in CGI.pm).
+
+In ikiwiki, this appears to have been exploitable in two places, both
+of them relatively minor:
+
+* in the comments plugin, an attacker who was able to post a comment
+ could give it a user-specified author and author-URL even if the wiki
+ configuration did not allow for that, by crafting multiple values
+ for other fields
+* in the editpage plugin, an attacker who was able to edit a page
+ could potentially forge commit authorship (attribute their edit to
+ someone else) by crafting multiple values for the rcsinfo field
+
+(OVE-20161226-0001)