and refresh site.
Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
-[[!template id=gitbranch branch=peteg/revert author="[[peteg]]"]]
+[[!template id=gitbranch branch=peteg/revert author="[[users/peteg]]"]]
->> It is on a separate branch now. --[[peteg]]
+>> It is on a separate branch now. --[[users/peteg]]
> Review: --[[Joey]]
>
> The revert commit will not currently say what web user did the revert.
> This could be fixed by doing a --no-commit revert first and then using
> rcs_commit_staged.
->> Fixed, I think. --[[peteg]]
+>> Fixed, I think. --[[users/peteg]]
>
> So I see one thing I completly forgot about is `check_canedit`. Avoiding users
> using reverting to make changes they would normally not be allowed to do is
> structure that `rcs_recieve` does. This could be done by using `git revert
> --no-commit`, and then examining the changes, and then `git reset` to drop
> them.
->> We can use the existing `git_commit_info` with the patch ID - no need to touch the working directory. -- [[peteg]]
+>> We can use the existing `git_commit_info` with the patch ID - no need to touch the working directory. -- [[users/peteg]]
>
> Then the code that is currently in IkiWiki/Receive.pm, that calls
> `check_canedit` and `check_canremove` to test the change, can be
> straightforwardly refactored out, and used for checking reverts too.
->> Wow, that was easy. :-) -- [[peteg]]
+>> Wow, that was easy. :-) -- [[users/peteg]]
>
> (The data from `rcs_preprevert` could also be used for a confirmation
> prompt -- it doesn't currently include enough info for diffs, but at
>> Taken care of by refactoring `rcs_receive` in `git.pm`
>> I've tested it lightly in my single-user setup. It's a little nasty that the `attachment` plugin
>> gets used to check whether attachments are allowed -- there really should be a hook for that.
+>>> I agree, but have not figured out a way to make a hook work yet.
+>>> --[[Joey]]
>>
->> Please look it over and tell me what else needs fixing... -- [[peteg]]
+>> Please look it over and tell me what else needs fixing... -- [[users/peteg]]
->>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few fixes in there
->>> [[!template id=gitbranch branch=origin/revert author="[[joey]]"]]
->>> (and fixed all the indention..). Issues I noticed but have not gotten
->>> to: --[[Joey]]
->>>> Please change the git pointer above, then. I will work on your branch. -- [[peteg]]
+>>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few^Wseveral fixes in there.
+>>> All merged to master now! --[[Joey]]
->>> * Would it be better for `rcs_revert` to not commit, and
->>> `rcs_commit_staged` to then be used? This would work for git, but
->>> maybe other RCSs would be problimatic. It would simplifiy the
->>> interface and allow for future mulitple-revert interfaces.
->>> * I quite don't understand why one caller of `git_parse_changes`
->>> needs it to chdir, and not the other one. It's running
->>> in the same git repo either way, and git doesn't need
->>> `git show` to run in a subdir at all..
->>>> I was aping (preserving) what was already there. I don't understand what you say about `git show` - it must run under $srcdir, surely? And empirically the CGI process wasn't in the right place. By all means simplify that. -- [[peteg]]
-
->>> * Probably needs to untaint the revs passed in.
->>> * Seems backwards for `rcs_preprevert` to import and
->>> use `IkiWiki::Receive`.
->>>> Indeed. This is saying that the checking code in IkiWiki::Receive is in the wrong place. I think it would be better to set up some general hooks and shuffle it into a plugin, for then other plugins that maintain special files in the repo can have a say about validity. -- [[peteg]]
+[[done]]