As far as I know, aptitude is recommended by Debian. And who does use apt-get instead...

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / plugins / write.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/plugins/write.mdwn b/doc/plugins/write.mdwn
index 405876d58a9a7200e01d2d77ed91cb9892523ed4..99eea3d1696b3240647b439edae4d8768ddf1033 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/plugins/write.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/write.mdwn
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ can check if the session object has a "name" parameter set.
 
 ### canedit
 
-       hook(type => "canedit", id => "foo", call => \&pagelocked);
+       hook(type => "canedit", id => "foo", call => \&canedit);
 
 This hook can be used to implement arbitrary access methods to control when
 a page can be edited using the web interface (commits from revision control
@@ -321,6 +321,26 @@ This hook should avoid directly redirecting the user to a signin page,
 since it's sometimes used to test to see which pages in a set of pages a
 user can edit.
 
+### checkcontent
+       
+       hook(type => "checkcontent", id => "foo", call => \&checkcontent);
+
+This hook is called to check the content a user has entered on a page,
+before it is saved, and decide if it should be allowed.
+
+It is passed named parameters: `content`, `page`, `cgi`, and `session`. If
+the content the user has entered is a comment, it may also be passed some
+additional parameters: `author`, `url`, and `subject`. The `subject`
+parameter may also be filled with the user's comment about the change.
+
+Note: When the user edits an existing wiki page, the passed `content` will
+include only the lines that they added to the page, or modified.
+
+The hook should return `undef` on success. If the content is disallowed, it
+should return a message stating what the problem is, or a function
+that can be run to perform whatever action is necessary to allow the user
+to post the content.
+
 ### editcontent
 
        hook(type => "editcontent", id => "foo", call => \&editcontent);