#Ikiwiki plugin for the Monotone revision control system.
-I've just made a patch to the ikiwiki code that allows it to use the [Monotone](http://monotone.ca/) revision control system. It is available at:
+I've just made a patch to the ikiwiki code that allows it to use the [[rcs/Monotone]] revision control system. It is available at:
<http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/monotone-ikiwiki.diff>
-At the moment it supports basic committing and listing recent changes. It does not support rcs_notify() or rcs_getctime() yet. Moreover,
-while there is support for simultaneous commits (e.g. conflicts), it is untested and if it happens to work would leave the repository in an unmerged state.
+At the moment it is basically complete. At present rcs_notify() is implemeted but untested, the rest is implemented and tested.
-But it is better than nothing.
+The current version of the patch handles conflicts through the web interface. It is still not perfect as it will break if there is a rename that conflicts with a web change (but so will the other Rcs plugins I think). It also commits a revision with conflict markers if there is a conflict requiring such markers... ick.
+
+Note: This patch requires a rather recent Monotone perl module (18 August 2007 or later). It is available from the monotone repository here: <http://viewmtn.angrygoats.net/branch/changes/net.venge.monotone>.
+
+> The setup instructions to add 40 lines of code to monotonerc is pretty frightning stuff.
+> Is there some way this can be automated? --[[Joey]]
+
+>> I've committed a bunch of this to monotone so that in future it could be removed.
+>> I've also just fixed this so it is in a separate, automagically generated, rc file.
+
+>>> Fair enough. Didn't realize you were a monotone committer. :-)
+
+>>>> I am, but still a little newish. Feedback is good.
+
+> Having rcs_commit return a warning message when there's an unresolved conflict
+> isn't right; that message will populate the page edit box. You might want
+> to use the error() function here?
+
+>> It should never reach that case, so I have changed that to error.
+
+> There'an incomplete comment ending with "note, this relies on the fact that"
+
+>> erg... sorry, fixed.
+
+[[tag patch]]
+
+>> I've [[accepted|done]] this patch, thank you!
+>>
+>> I did make a few changes. Please review, and make sure it still works
+>> (a test case like we have for some of the other RCSes would be nice..)
+>>
+>> BTW, will all the monotone output parsing work if LANG != C?
+>>
+>> Do monotone post-commit hooks actually use REV?
+>> --[[Joey]]