-- [[JeremyReed]]
> Discussion pages should clearly be a special case that don't get Discussion
-> links put at the top... aaand.. [[done]]! --[[Joey]]
+> links put at the top... aaand.. [[bugs/done]]! --[[Joey]]
+
+>>> Joey, I've just seen that you closed that bug in ikiwiki 1.37, but it seems
+>>> you fixed it only for English "discussion" page. The bug still occurs
+>>> for the international "discussion" pages. I have backported ikiwiki 1.40
+>>> and I can see "Dyskusja" link on my Polish "dyskusja" pages. --[[Paweł|ptecza]]
+
+>>> Yes, I missed that string when internationalizing ikiwiki, fixed now.
+
+>>>> Thanks a lot for the quick fix, Joey! It works for me :)
+
+>>>> BTW, I had to apply the patch manually, because I have a problem
+>>>> with building ikiwiki 1.41 Debian package:
+
+>>>> ptecza@devel2:~/svn/ikiwiki$ LANG=C dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot
+>>>> [...]
+>>>> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ptecza/svn/ikiwiki/po'
+>>>> msgfmt -o bg.mo bg.po
+>>>> msgfmt -o cs.mo cs.po
+>>>> msgfmt -o es.mo es.po
+>>>> msgfmt -o fr.mo fr.po
+>>>> msgfmt -o gu.mo gu.po
+>>>> msgfmt -o pl.mo pl.po
+>>>> Merging ikiwiki.pot and sv.pomsgmerge: sv.po: warning: Charset missing in header.
+>>>> Message conversion to user's charset will not work.
+>>>> sv.po:10:2: parse error
+>>>> sv.po:10: keyword "mine" unknown
+>>>> sv.po:14: keyword "r2262" unknown
+>>>> sv.po:37:2: parse error
+>>>> sv.po:37: keyword "mine" unknown
+>>>> sv.po:43: keyword "r2262" unknown
+>>>> sv.po:52:2: parse error
+>>>> sv.po:52: keyword "mine" unknown
+>>>> sv.po:56: keyword "r2262" unknown
+>>>> msgmerge: found 9 fatal errors
+>>>> make[2]: *** [sv.po] Error 1
+>>>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ptecza/svn/ikiwiki/po'
+>>>> make[1]: *** [extra_build] Error 2
+>>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ptecza/svn/ikiwiki'
+>>>> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
+
+>>>> I think you should be notified about it :) --[[Paweł|ptecza]]
+
+>>>>> You have an unresolved svn conflict in some files in po, looks like.
+
+>>>>>> Thanks for the hint! You're absolutely right again, Joey! It's because of
+>>>>>> I always do `svn up` command (for CVS repo `cvs up` is enough :) )
+>>>>>> and I never use `svn status` command. Yes, now I know I should do it :)
+
+>>>>>> First I removed conflicting `sv.po` file and next I updated it and
+>>>>>> it has resolved the problem. --[[Paweł|ptecza]]