+
+>> I know I've looked at 88c6e2891593fd508701d728602515e47284180c
+>> before, and something about it just seemed wrong. Maybe it's
+>> the triviality of the sub, which it would seem to be easy to
+>> decide to refactor back into its one caller (which would reintroduce the
+>> bug). --[[Joey]]
+
+>>> Well, I can hear and understand this. Apart of adding a comment to
+>>> the sub, explaining the rationale (which is now done in my po
+>>> branch), I don't know what I can do to make it not seem wrong.
+>>> --[[intrigeri]]