# the rest should perhaps be added to the autofile machinery
By "a generic version of" above, it seems I mean "almost, but not
-quite, entirely unlike". I tried digging through the git history for the
+quite, entirely unlike".
+
+> As long as it's not Tea. ;) --[[Joey]]
+
+I tried digging through the git history for the
reasoning behind the autofile and autoindex implementations, but now I'm
mostly confused.
manually-created version, but that doesn't necessarily mean we don't want
*something* to exist.
+> That could be argued, but it's a very DWIM thing. Probably best to keep
+> the behavior simple and predictable, so one only needs to remember that
+> when a page is deleted, nothing will ever re-create it behind ones back.
+> --[[Joey]]
+
## autoindex
The autoindex machinery records a more complex set. Items are added to the
that it shouldn't re-create the deleted page in the latter two situations:
* create auto-del-create-del/child, resulting in auto-del-create-del being
- created automatically
+ created automatically
* delete auto-del-create-del; it's added to `%deleted` and not re-created
* create auto-del-create-del manually; it's removed from `%deleted`
* delete auto-del-create-del again (it's re-created)
+and
+
* create create-del-auto
* delete create-del-auto; it's not added to `%deleted` because there's no
- child that would cause it to exist
+ child that would cause it to exist
* create create-del-auto/child
+
+> I doubt there is any good reason for this behavior. These are probably
+> bugs. --[[Joey]]