Added a comment

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / bugs / remove_orphaned_sparkline-php_from_Suggests.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/bugs/remove_orphaned_sparkline-php_from_Suggests.mdwn b/doc/bugs/remove_orphaned_sparkline-php_from_Suggests.mdwn
index 8f0482791d492ddad25df13d60e7d20ea8be5bd5..ab08c0b26c10781e8bbec407c21ec58b962bbf5d 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/bugs/remove_orphaned_sparkline-php_from_Suggests.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/remove_orphaned_sparkline-php_from_Suggests.mdwn
@@ -5,3 +5,18 @@ How about to replace sparkline-php from Suggests by a better alternative?
 I would like to file a RM bug to get it out of archive. Do you have a better alternative for it? PHP has a lot of them..
 
 Thanks
 I would like to file a RM bug to get it out of archive. Do you have a better alternative for it? PHP has a lot of them..
 
 Thanks

+
+> sparline-php is orphaned *in Debian*. Upstream, is has seen activity as
+> recently as 11 months ago.
+>
+> I don't know of a better alternative. I looked at the perl sparkline
+> stuff in CPAN and is was bad enough that the pain of using php from this
+> perl program was a better alternative.
+> 
+> Anyway, it works great; maintaining the sparkline-php package in Debian
+> would certianly be much less work than finding some alternative and
+> rewriting the ikiwiki code to use it, *and* packaging that alternative
+> and maintaining it in Debian. So your suggestion doesn't make a lot of
+> sense; Debian should just find a maintainer for sparkline-php. --[[Joey]]
+
+[[done]]