tweaks

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / security.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/security.mdwn b/doc/security.mdwn
index b294decc818006b55b71f1dcc8b9b54c35159ecb..fea0eb727d655fe2c7452174b08e3d718e7aae40 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/security.mdwn
+++ b/doc/security.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Let's do an ikiwiki security analysis..
+Let's do an ikiwiki security analysis.
 
 If you are using ikiwiki to render pages that only you can edit, do not
 generate any wrappers, and do not use the cgi, then there are no more
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ security issues with this program than with cat(1). If, however, you let
 others edit pages in your wiki, then some possible security issues do need
 to be kept in mind.
 
+[[toc levels=2]]
+
 ----
 
 # Probable holes
@@ -21,7 +23,7 @@ this would be to limit web commits to those done by a certian user.
 ## other stuff to look at
 
 I need to audit the git backend a bit, and have been meaning to
-see if any CRLF injection type things can be done.
+see if any CRLF injection type things can be done in the CGI code.
 
 ----
 
@@ -41,7 +43,7 @@ Of course nobody else seems to worry about this in other wikis, so should we?
 
 Currently only people with direct svn commit access can upload such files
 (and if you wanted to you could block that with a svn pre-commit hook).
-Wsers with only web commit access are limited to editing pages as ikiwiki
+Users with only web commit access are limited to editing pages as ikiwiki
 doesn't support file uploads from browsers (yet), so they can't exploit
 this.
 
@@ -83,6 +85,10 @@ _(AKA, the assumptions that will be the root of most security holes...)_
 Someone could add bad content to the wiki and hope to exploit ikiwiki.
 Note that ikiwiki runs with perl taint checks on, so this is unlikely.
 
+One fun thing in ikiwiki is its handling of a PageSpec, which involves
+translating it into perl and running the perl. Of course, this is done
+*very* carefully to guard against injecting arbitrary perl code.
+
 ## publishing cgi scripts
 
 ikiwiki does not allow cgi scripts to be published as part of the wiki. Or
@@ -130,7 +136,9 @@ file not be world readable.
 
 Login to the wiki involves sending a password in cleartext over the net.
 Cracking the password only allows editing the wiki as that user though.
-If you care, you can use https, I suppose.
+If you care, you can use https, I suppose. If you do use https either for
+all of the wiki, or just the cgi access, then consider using the sslcookie
+option.
 
 ## XSS holes in CGI output
 
@@ -141,6 +149,13 @@ with a username containing html code (anymore).
 It's difficult to know for sure if all such avenues have really been
 closed though.
 
+## HTML::Template security
+
+If the [[plugins/template]] plugin is enabled, users can modify templates
+like any other part of the wiki. This assumes that HTML::Template is secure
+when used with untrusted/malicious templates. (Note that includes are not
+allowed, so that's not a problem.)
+
 ----
 
 # Fixed holes
@@ -234,3 +249,19 @@ have come just before yours, by forging svn log output. This was
 guarded against by using svn log --xml.
 
 ikiwiki escapes any html in svn commit logs to prevent other mischief.
+
+## XML::Parser
+
+XML::Parser is used by the aggregation plugin, and has some security holes. 
+Bug #[378411](http://bugs.debian.org/378411) does not
+seem to affect our use, since the data is not encoded as utf-8 at that
+point. #[378412](http://bugs.debian.org/378412) could affect us, although it
+doesn't seem very exploitable. It has a simple fix, and has been fixed in
+Debian unstable.
+
+## include loops
+
+Various directives that cause one page to be included into another could
+be exploited to DOS the wiki, by causing a loop. Ikiwiki has always guarded
+against this one way or another; the current solution should detect all
+types of loops involving preprocessor directives.