web commit by EdAvis

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / security.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/security.mdwn b/doc/security.mdwn
index b294decc818006b55b71f1dcc8b9b54c35159ecb..dc763ef40a01bbae7d0f7ec09a3b8d08130dee89 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/security.mdwn
+++ b/doc/security.mdwn
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Let's do an ikiwiki security analysis..
+Let's do an ikiwiki security analysis.

 
 If you are using ikiwiki to render pages that only you can edit, do not
 generate any wrappers, and do not use the cgi, then there are no more
 
 If you are using ikiwiki to render pages that only you can edit, do not
 generate any wrappers, and do not use the cgi, then there are no more


@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ this would be to limit web commits to those done by a certian user.
 ## other stuff to look at
 
 I need to audit the git backend a bit, and have been meaning to
 ## other stuff to look at
 
 I need to audit the git backend a bit, and have been meaning to

-see if any CRLF injection type things can be done.
+see if any CRLF injection type things can be done in the CGI code.

 
 ----
 
 
 ----
 


@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Of course nobody else seems to worry about this in other wikis, so should we?
 
 Currently only people with direct svn commit access can upload such files
 (and if you wanted to you could block that with a svn pre-commit hook).
 
 Currently only people with direct svn commit access can upload such files
 (and if you wanted to you could block that with a svn pre-commit hook).

-Wsers with only web commit access are limited to editing pages as ikiwiki
+Users with only web commit access are limited to editing pages as ikiwiki

 doesn't support file uploads from browsers (yet), so they can't exploit
 this.
 
 doesn't support file uploads from browsers (yet), so they can't exploit
 this.
 


@@ -83,6 +83,10 @@ _(AKA, the assumptions that will be the root of most security holes...)_
 Someone could add bad content to the wiki and hope to exploit ikiwiki.
 Note that ikiwiki runs with perl taint checks on, so this is unlikely.
 
 Someone could add bad content to the wiki and hope to exploit ikiwiki.
 Note that ikiwiki runs with perl taint checks on, so this is unlikely.
 

+One fun thing in ikiwiki is its handling of a PageSpec, which involves
+translating it into perl and running the perl. Of course, this is done
+*very* carefully to guard against injecting arbitrary perl code.
+

 ## publishing cgi scripts
 
 ikiwiki does not allow cgi scripts to be published as part of the wiki. Or
 ## publishing cgi scripts
 
 ikiwiki does not allow cgi scripts to be published as part of the wiki. Or


@@ -141,6 +145,13 @@ with a username containing html code (anymore).
 It's difficult to know for sure if all such avenues have really been
 closed though.
 
 It's difficult to know for sure if all such avenues have really been
 closed though.
 

+## HTML::Template security
+
+If the [[plugins/template]] plugin is enabled, users can modify templates
+like any other part of the wiki. This assumes that HTML::Template is secure
+when used with untrusted/malicious templates. (Note that includes are not
+allowed, so that's not a problem.)
+

 ----
 
 # Fixed holes
 ----
 
 # Fixed holes


@@ -234,3 +245,12 @@ have come just before yours, by forging svn log output. This was
 guarded against by using svn log --xml.
 
 ikiwiki escapes any html in svn commit logs to prevent other mischief.
 guarded against by using svn log --xml.
 
 ikiwiki escapes any html in svn commit logs to prevent other mischief.

+
+## XML::Parser
+
+XML::Parser is used by the aggregation plugin, and has some security holes. 
+Bug #[378411](http://bugs.debian.org/378411) does not
+seem to affect our use, since the data is not encoded as utf-8 at that
+point. #[378412](http://bugs.debian.org/378412) could affect us, although it
+doesn't seem very exploitable. It has a simple fix, and has been fixed in
+Debian unstable.