-The edit function has a problem when running with [[debpkg thttpd]]
-or [[debpkg mini-httpd]]: for some reason the headers ikiwiki
-outputs are transmitted as the page content.
+The "ikwiki.cgi?page=index&do=edit" function has a problem
+when running with [[!debpkg thttpd]] or [[!debpkg mini-httpd]]:
+for some reason the headers ikiwiki outputs are transmitted
+as the page content. Surprisingly, the "do=prefs" function
+works as expected.
Here is what it looks like in iceweasel:
<html>
(...)
-Ikiwiki runs fine with [[debpkg boa]].
+Ikiwiki runs fine with [[!debpkg boa]].
---[[JeremieKoenig]]
\ No newline at end of file
+--[[JeremieKoenig]]
+
+It doesn't work for signin either.
+What is the reason for these "header => 1" in FormBuilder initialisations?
+Why do they appear two times with conflicting values in the very same hashes?
+
+--[[JeremieKoenig]]
+
+> Clearly those duplicate header settings are a mistake. But in all cases, the
+> `header => 0` came second, so it _should_ override the other value and
+> can't be causing this problem. (cgi_signin only sets it to 0, too).
+>
+> What version of formbuilder are you using? If you run ikiwiki.cgi at the
+> command line, do you actually see duplicate headers? I don't:
+
+ joey@kodama:~/html>REQUEST_METHOD=GET QUERY_STRING="page=index&do=edit" ./ikiwiki.cgi
+ Set-Cookie: ikiwiki_session_joey=41a847ac9c31574c1e8f5c6081c74d12; path=/
+ Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:04:06 GMT
+ Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
+
+ <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+
+> Do thttpd and mini-httpd perhaps not realize that Set-Cookis is the start of
+> the headers? --[[Joey]]
+
+>> Thanks for your help: I think I found the problem!
+>> Ikiwiki outputs (in my case) the following
+>> error message on stderr, followed by an empty line:
+
+ /srv/ikiwiki/wc/index.mdwn: (Not a versioned resource)
+
+>> Probably thttpd and mini-httpd read stderr as well as stdout, while apache
+>> and boa don't. When using a shell-script wrapper as the CGI,
+>> which redirects ikiwiki's error output to /dev/null, it works better.
+
+>> The edit still fails to commit, because in my wiki, index.mdwn is
+>> pulled from the base wiki and somehow ikiwiki wants to change it
+>> rather that create it.
+
+>> --[[JeremieKoenig]]
+
+>>> If thttpd and mini-httpd interpret CGI's stderr as stdout, then
+>>> they're not properly following the CGI spec, and will break with tons
+>>> of cgi scripts besides ikiwiki. And of course there are many many cases
+>>> where ikiwiki might output to stderr, and that's the right thing to do.
+>>> So I don't see any way to address this in ikiwiki. --[[Joey]]
+
+>>>> (reported as [[!debbug 437927]] and [[!debbug 437932]]) --[[JeremieKoenig]]
+
+Marking [[done]] since it's not really an ikiwiki bug. --[[Joey]]
+
+----
+
+I'm getting some odd behaviour with boa. When I edit a page and click "Save
+Page", the URL I get taken to produces a 403 - Forbidden error until I recompile
+the wiki. For example, after editing the root page of the wiki it brings me back to
+`http://localhost/~pdw/iki/?updated`, and I see a 403 error message. Then, if
+I open up a terminal and type `ikiwiki --setup ikiwiki.setup`, and then go back
+to the browser and hit Ctrl-R, the page displays correctly, with the same URL
+that gave an error a moment ago. This is with boa 0.94.14rc21-3 and Firefox
+3.0.11 on Ubuntu 9.04. I get the feeling I'm doing something wrong somewhere;
+any suggestions where to start looking? This is a very basic setup, so feel
+free to ask. --Paul
+
+Tried setting up a git repository back-end for the wiki, in case the `post-update`
+hook caused the right updates to happen; it didn't. (But I do now have my wiki
+in git!)
+
+Turns out that `.../destdir/index.html` was being recreated after a web edit, or
+at least having its permissions modified, and being left without world-read
+permissions. Boa was then rightly refusing to serve the page. Adding the
+`umask 022` config option to `ikiwiki.setup` fixed everything, and all
+appears to be working fine now. --Paul.
+
+> Since others seem to have gotten ikiwiki working with boa,
+> I'm guessing that this is not a generic problem with boa, but that
+> your boa was started from a shell that had an unusual umask and inherited
+> that. --[[Joey]]
+
+(I'm new to wiki etiquette - would it be more polite to leave these details on the
+wiki, or to remove them and only leave a short summary? Thanks. --Paul)
+
+> Well, I just try to keep things understandable and clear, whether than
+> means deleting bad old data or not. That said, this page is a bug report,
+> that was already closed. It's generally better to open a new bug report
+> rather than edit an old closed one. --[[Joey]]