poll vote (Accept only OpenID for logins)

[git.ikiwiki.info.git] / doc / todo / web_reversion.mdwn

diff --git a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
index e0c6ebdf1001001a026292514ecb54cf9b851ce8..33fa79aad8474a4d91358ce95d571d01a425da8d 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/web_reversion.mdwn
@@ -67,10 +67,14 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
 >> Please look it over and tell me what else needs fixing... -- [[peteg]]
 
 >>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few fixes in there
 >> Please look it over and tell me what else needs fixing... -- [[peteg]]
 
 >>> I have made my own revert branch and put a few fixes in there

+>>> [[!template id=gitbranch branch=origin/revert author="[[joey]]"]]

 >>> (and fixed all the indention..). Issues I noticed but have not gotten
 >>> to: --[[Joey]] 
 >>> (and fixed all the indention..). Issues I noticed but have not gotten
 >>> to: --[[Joey]] 

+>>>> Please change the git pointer above, then. I will work on your branch. -- [[peteg]]

 >>>
 >>> * `rcs_diff` already exists; why add `rcs_showpatch`?
 >>>
 >>> * `rcs_diff` already exists; why add `rcs_showpatch`?

+>>>> If `rcs_diff` is intended for human consumption, by all means we can use that. -- [[peteg]]
+

 >>> * Would it be better for `rcs_revert` to not commit, and
 >>>   `rcs_commit_staged` to then be used? This would work for git, but
 >>>   maybe other RCSs would be problimatic. It would simplifiy the
 >>> * Would it be better for `rcs_revert` to not commit, and
 >>>   `rcs_commit_staged` to then be used? This would work for git, but
 >>>   maybe other RCSs would be problimatic. It would simplifiy the


@@ -79,6 +83,9 @@ Peter Gammie has done an initial implementation of the above.
 >>>   needs it to chdir, and not the other one. It's running
 >>>   in the same git repo either way, and git doesn't need
 >>>   `git show` to run in a subdir at all..
 >>>   needs it to chdir, and not the other one. It's running
 >>>   in the same git repo either way, and git doesn't need
 >>>   `git show` to run in a subdir at all..

+>>>> I was aping (preserving) what was already there. I don't understand what you say about `git show` - it must run under $srcdir, surely? And empirically the CGI process wasn't in the right place. By all means simplify that. -- [[peteg]]
+

 >>> * Probably needs to untaint the revs passed in.
 >>> * Seems backwards for `rcs_preprevert` to import and
 >>>   use `IkiWiki::Receive`.
 >>> * Probably needs to untaint the revs passed in.
 >>> * Seems backwards for `rcs_preprevert` to import and
 >>>   use `IkiWiki::Receive`.

+>>>> Indeed. This is saying that the checking code in IkiWiki::Receive is in the wrong place. I think it would be better to set up some general hooks and shuffle it into a plugin, for then other plugins that maintain special files in the repo can have a say about validity. -- [[peteg]]