1 #Ikiwiki plugin for the Monotone revision control system.
3 I've just made a patch to the ikiwiki code that allows it to use the [[rcs/Monotone]] revision control system. It is available at:
5 <http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/monotone-ikiwiki.diff>
7 At the moment it is basically complete. At present rcs_notify() is implemeted but untested, the rest is implemented and tested.
9 The current version of the patch handles conflicts through the web interface. It is still not perfect as it will break if there is a rename that conflicts with a web change (but so will the other Rcs plugins I think). It also commits a revision with conflict markers if there is a conflict requiring such markers... ick.
11 Note: This patch requires a rather recent Monotone perl module (18 August 2007 or later). It is available from the monotone repository here: <http://viewmtn.angrygoats.net/branch/changes/net.venge.monotone>.
13 > The setup instructions to add 40 lines of code to monotonerc is pretty frightning stuff.
14 > Is there some way this can be automated? --[[Joey]]
16 >> I've committed a bunch of this to monotone so that in future it could be removed.
17 >> I've also just fixed this so it is in a separate, automagically generated, rc file.
19 >>> Fair enough. Didn't realize you were a monotone committer. :-)
21 >>>> I am, but still a little newish. Feedback is good. In particular, this is my first major bit of PERL.
23 > Having rcs_commit return a warning message when there's an unresolved conflict
24 > isn't right; that message will populate the page edit box. You might want
25 > to use the error() function here?
27 >> It should never reach that case, so I have changed that to error.
29 > There'an incomplete comment ending with "note, this relies on the fact that"
31 >> erg... sorry, fixed.
35 >> I've [[accepted|done]] this patch, thank you!
37 >>> Thanks for committing it. I hate keeping my own diffs. :)
39 >> I did make a few changes. Please review, and make sure it still works
40 >> (a test case like we have for some of the other RCSes would be nice..)
42 >>> Tested. It still works at least as well as it did. I'll try to get to a test case soon.
43 >>> In checking the source I noticed a few bogus comments I left in when editing,
44 >>> and a bug in page adding.
45 >>> Here is a small patch for them:
49 Here is another patch. It fixes a FIXME you added. I was using $file within backticks because
50 I was getting an error trying to do it right. I've figured out the error, and now do it right. This
51 should also speed things up (very slightly)
53 Index: IkiWiki/Rcs/monotone.pm
54 ===================================================================
55 --- IkiWiki/Rcs/monotone.pm (revision 4234)
56 +++ IkiWiki/Rcs/monotone.pm (working copy)
59 # Something has been committed, has this file changed?
61 - #$automator->setOpts("-r", $oldrev, "-r", $rev);
62 - #my ($out, $err) = $automator->call("content_diff", $file);
63 - #debug("Problem committing $file") if ($err ne "");
64 - # FIXME: use of $file in these backticks is not wise from a
65 - # security POV. Probably safe, but should be avoided
67 - # At the moment the backticks are used because the above call using the automate
68 - # interface was failing. When that bug in monotone is fixed, we should switch
70 - my $diff = `mtn --root=$config{mtnrootdir} au content_diff -r $oldrev -r $rev $file`; # was just $out;
72 + $automator->setOpts("r", $oldrev, "r", $rev);
73 + ($out, $err) = $automator->call("content_diff", $file);
74 + debug("Problem committing $file") if ($err ne "");
78 # Commit a revision with just this file changed off
82 >> BTW, will all the monotone output parsing work if LANG != C?
84 >>> It should (he says crossing fingers).
85 >>> In the places where I do any complex parsing I'm using a special
86 >>> version of the mtn commands designed for scripting. They have a
87 >>> stable, easy to parse, output that doesn't get translated (I think).
89 >> Do monotone post-commit hooks actually use REV?
91 >>> Monotone post-commit hooks are written in Lua and can do
92 >>> what they please. Setting the REV environment var before
93 >>> calling Ikiwiki seems reasonable, but I've not written the
96 >>>> So the rcs_notify support is not just untested, but can't work
97 >>>> at all w/o further development.